Dec 8th – Become 1 of 1,806,000 New “Musk Millionaires” [How To Guide]

Wall Street has spent two years debating which companies will win the AI infrastructure race. Nvidia chips, hyperscaler capex, grid capacity. The conversation has been almost entirely about supply. The constraint that is now reshaping the investment landscape is demand: whether local governments will allow data centers to be built at all.

Public opposition to data center construction is growing, setting up AI as one of the defining political issues of the 2026 midterm elections on November 3. The financial stakes are not abstract. Goldman Sachs Research and S&P Global have both put expected hyperscaler capex tied to AI and data centers at roughly $5.3 trillion through 2030. A meaningful share of that spending requires permits, rezoning approvals, and power interconnection agreements that are becoming harder to obtain by the month.

The numbers from the ground are striking. A Data Center Watch report said local opposition blocked or delayed about $130 billion of data center projects in the first quarter of 2026. A recent survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, conducted June 16 to July 19, found 61% of U.S. adults opposed a new data center in their area, up 12 percentage points from its February to March survey. That is not a fringe position. That is a supermajority.

Data center construction has become a rallying cry in the midterms, with state and federal lawmakers on both sides of the aisle showing more skepticism toward these projects as Election Day approaches. The issue has entered individual races across the country, including high-profile contests in Ohio and Pennsylvania. New York has paused new discretionary state permits for new hyperscale data centers for up to one year while it completes a statewide environmental review. Pennsylvania has removed AI data center projects from its Permit Fast Track Program. In September, Texas Governor Greg Abbott directed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to halt permits sought by data centers until ERCOT completes an audit.

Wall Street feels reassured by the prospect of a presidential veto on any bold legislation that comes from Capitol Hill. That may be a reasonable backstop against federal legislation. It is no backstop at all against county commissioners, state environmental agencies, and utility commissions. The opposition is operating below the veto line, in the very venues that control whether a shovel ever enters the ground.

Raymond James political analyst Ed Mills put the market’s complacency plainly. “What I consistently hear from investors is that the opposition to data centers is really about the political backlash and that after the midterms things get a lot better. But I think that after the midterms, things get worse. That is a huge blind spot for the market.”

This is where the investment thesis sharpens. The companies that have already locked in approved sites, signed power purchase agreements, and cleared interconnection queues occupy a fundamentally different position from those still assembling parcels and hoping for zoning board goodwill. Constellation Energy is the largest nuclear operator in the United States. It has signed long-term nuclear PPAs with Microsoft and Meta, among others. Vistra signed a 20-year PPA with Amazon Web Services for carbon-free power from Comanche Peak in September 2025, followed by 20-year PPAs with Meta for 2,609 MW from its PJM nuclear plants announced in January 2026. Talen Energy sold its data center campus adjacent to its Susquehanna nuclear plant to Amazon Web Services in March 2024, with a power supply agreement tied to the site, creating a colocation model that can rely on an already-permitted, operating facility.

That co-location logic matters. FERC has moved to push regional grid operators to clarify and reform rules for large loads, and it has separately directed PJM to adopt transparent tariff rules for loads co-located with generation. The firms that already hold that combination face a structurally different regulatory environment than developers still in the queue.

The midterms on November 3 will not resolve the local opposition. Equity markets and national politics may be on a collision course, and some analysts say the fallout could persist well beyond the election. For long-term capital allocators, the cleaner question is which businesses are positioned to build regardless of how the vote goes. Companies anchored to approved power and permitted land have already answered it. Everyone else is still asking.